Having lived through the 60's as a teenager, I found the pop music liberating, which is neither good nor bad. The post world war 2 attitude of the "silent era" was strongly conservative and certainly needed a refreshing overhaul by way of a challenge. I for one am grateful for having lived in those years whch helped to open my eyes to question everything and also to discover who I really am.
There's some quote that goes something like this: never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. AND, the older I get, the more I think it is the opposite. No, scratch that. I think it boils down to follow the money.
Absolutely fascinating reading!
I believe your substack is going to grow by leaps and bounds. I appreciated the links. Somehow you kept me reading past my initial skepticism.
I think another link between artists with military parents is that they are already used to moving a lot. Touring is not as big a deal for them.
Simone, thank you for the note, and apologies for the delayed reply.
You raise an interesting point about that quote. I've found that the deeper you dig into these patterns, the harder it becomes to chalk things up to mere incompetence or coincidence. The odds become infinitesimal.
When putting together pieces like this, I'm trying to thread a delicate needle - providing enough solid documentation to make the case without overwhelming readers with too much detail. The goal is to show that these aren't random coincidences while keeping the narrative clear and digestible. Glad you made it through the whole thing, despite your initial skepticism - that's exactly the kind of careful consideration these topics deserve.
BTW, that's a great observation about military kids and touring - I hadn't considered that angle, but it makes perfect sense.
Sigh. So much weaponization of everything. No wonder we’re facing such a medical and spiritual autoimmunity crisis. We’re being primed to either surrender to or fight everything. The confusion keeps us constantly vigilant. And while I have heard bits of what you’ve explained so comprehensively, it’s overwhelming to see all at once.
The trouble becomes that we become resistant to things that could serve us in other nuanced ways because of how ideas like personal growth, art, self-care/acceptance, empowerment, advocacy have been distorted and exploited.
The growth curves are so steep and treacherous, but we try to stay on them…
Your insight about autoimmunity and constant vigilance is profound. These systems are designed to keep us in exactly that state of perpetual anxiety and confusion.
You're right - it's overwhelming to confront the possibility that much of what we considered 'authentic' may have been anything but. But understanding the depth and depravity of the deception, however uncomfortable, is crucial. Only by recognizing how deep the manipulation goes can we begin to reclaim genuine human experience and connection.
The path forward isn't cynicism about everything, but clear-eyed discernment. Difficult as it is, we need to look unflinchingly at the machinery of control to free ourselves from it.
As a boomer born in the late fifties, I'm wondering what and how an actually liberated person undefined by the systemic cultural herding would be like? How, in God's name, would I be different than the person I was manufactured to be?
Many of the groups during this era did not play their own instruments. It wasn't just the Monkees. The Byrd's were backed by professional players, including Glen Campbell. Very few bands toured. They lip synced on programs like Ed Sullivan, Shindig and Hullabaloo. I had a friend who attended high school in Alameda CA with Jim Morrison. I didn't believe him until he showed me the photo in his high school yearbook.
As if there weren't enough red pills... and now this. Urgh. I'm not sure I can take any more. You've successfully ruined my youth. But this is the price of waking up. Thank you, Joshua. No, that wasn't me being cynical. It's pieces like this (and its predecessor) that start to complete a picture none of us really want to see but we have to anyway. Bring it on.
My mom said something similar when I shared my Beatles research with her. I'll say to you what I told her: still cherish those memories while understanding the bigger picture.
'I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.'
Josh, proof your "The Celebrity Machine graph. It's missing a word or thought:
The approach perfected through Gloria Steinem - channeling authentic social movements through carefully managed spokespersons - would evolve into today's meticulously crafted (what's missing here) This algorithmic management extends beyond content to talent itself, with platforms increasingly determining not just what succeeds but which voices rise to prominence.
Interesting, with many deeply buried and odd coincidences unearthed and aligned in apparently under-appreciated and telling ways. But if you want to persuade a wider audience you’ve still got work to do, because ultimately it all seems a bit attenuated. So, nice try, but you don’t actually score heavily for pointing out the fact that many entertainment industry stars and lower-visibility stalwarts have strange connections. Taking note of that, even as extensively as you do, doesn’t prove much, nor is it new news. Because the smoke from those fires has been hanging in the air for a very long time. It is understandable how Hollywood and the media biz have generated a legacy that fuels such suspicions. (Here’s one you seem to have missed: the strange demise of Marilyn Monroe.) One huge reason for that is the pervasive undercurrent of nepotism that undergirds much of its unofficial employment policy. That’s been a-feature-not-a-bug since day 1. But nepotism in business hiring is a much broader and more venerable tendency, as you must admit. One thing you seem to be pointing out is the similarity and affinity between people who aspire to dominance-through-influence in both domains: entertainment and government. The connection may seem newsworthy in many particulars, but isn’t that also actually business as usual? To clinch the case you need to expand the frame, consider counterfactuals, and admit the possibility that genuinely organic tendencies and trends exist and may thus mingle with utterly crass commercialization; my favorite example of this phenomenon is the twin-billing of The Monkees and Jimi Hendrix - strange but true, it actually happened. As a tail-end boomer my OG teen culture hero was a scruffy, swarthy working class New Englander with French Canadian and Breton roots. He had no substantial social connections and died of alcoholism in his mid-40s. He was one part lapsed Catholic and 2 parts libertine, with a sublime poetic impulse. His early friends included criminals, bums, and the founder of National Review. He served in the merchant marine during WWII after deciding to quit Columbia and his spot on its football team. His relationships were all kind of tortured or slap-dash affairs, including the friendship with a roguish buddy that became the basis for his best and most influential work. He originally produced that piece in a benzo-fueled marathon, typing like the madman he was on a continuous roll of paper. But he remains one of the most influential figures in 20th century American culture. I’ve looked into him closely several times over the last 45+ years, and have yet to fully grasp what it was that his audience - almost entirely young - responded to in him. The sex? The drugs? The fast cars? The jazz? Jack Kerouac remains a bit of a mystery. As do some others. They vary tremendously but still inspire wonder and hope. So hang in there, and keep working on your thing, and stay free.
I appreciate your thoughtful engagement with the material, Tim.
To clarify - this isn't meant to be comprehensive or persuasive, but rather documentation of ongoing research being shared with some friends and fellow researchers. While I'm considering whether to develop this into a longer-form book or film to make these stories more widely accessible, right now I'm approaching this as a student rather than a teacher - documenting, learning, and connecting with others doing similar research.
Monroe's story, for instance, wasn't overlooked but intentionally set aside as it deserves deeper treatment given its complex intersections with intelligence operations, cultural programming, and policy making. On Hendrix/Monkees - I didn't include it simply because I had nothing meaningful to add to Dave McGowan's thorough coverage.
The nepotism observation is interesting, but I'm specifically tracking unusual patterns like intelligence officers' children entering entertainment rather than following military paths, along with distinct patterns around aristocrats and orphans that merit their own detailed examination.
The documented connections between early Beat experiments with psychedelics and government-sponsored research programs at places like the Menlo Research Institute add another layer to your point about how cultural movements intersect with institutional power. Kerouac himself seemed to sense this by the end of his life, though he interpreted it through a different lens. That both Ginsberg and Kesey were early volunteers for government-sponsored LSD research, before "psychedelic" was even in the lexicon, remains one of the more striking examples of these institutional intersections with the counterculture.
Your insights suggest considerable research experience in these areas. If you're documenting any of your own investigations, I'd be very interested in reading them. Thanks again.
I’m just basing my lines on the motley assortment of anecdotes I’ve stumbled on over the years. It’s all very interesting and strange. I must admit that until learning more about the Ted Kascynski case I was inclined to poo-poo the possibility that domestic influence campaigns could entail such a level of convoluted horror. Then the Gary Webb story clinched perpetual suspicion for me. (Or was it the other way around?) One positive Beat contribution was to decline the casual acceptance of constraining norms, and pushing back against the clandestine control schemes you’ve noted is another way of doing that - thank you. We’ll have our hands full with this stuff going forward - but so will the bad guys, since their opposition is also formidable.
Sorry I missed this earlier, Tim. Really interesting point about Webb and Kaczynski as eye-openers on domestic influence ops. Webb's story especially shows the playbook - deny, discredit, then quietly admit it years later when no one's paying attention anymore. Totally agree about the road ahead. As you said, the opposition to these systems is getting more sophisticated too. The Beats' rejection of social programming feels more relevant than ever. Thanks for the thoughtful exchange.
As noted, the smoke has been hanging in the air for awhile now. But the efforts to keep it there persist - successfully in most cases. I've tracked a few fishy situations that merit more attention only to see the impact of revelations fall flat or run into outright denial. It's enough to induce general cynicism, that's for sure. But I'm glad someone's still digging.
Wow. Thank you for this. I had read about Laurel Canyon. My father was a VP for Capitol Records during that time until his death in 2004. I am trying to piece together what happened to him. This was helpful. I am still unlearning everything I was taught to believe. The process may never end at this rate.
Whoa, it must be profound to look back at that era with new eyes, especially given your direct family connection.
The process of unlearning and questioning our inherited beliefs is indeed ongoing - and often unsettling. But there's something powerful in seeking to understand our own histories and those of our family members that came before us. For what it's worth, I suspect most people in these industries were unassuming and not complicit in any wrongdoing - just doing their jobs and living their lives while larger forces operated behind the scenes.
You're not alone in this journey of discovery. Take care as you piece together these complex personal and historical threads.
This was a lot of great information in one place. I was aware of some of this prior, but not to this level of detail.
One question is how to move forward and continue to engage with the world when you realize almost everything you have experienced has been part of a manufactured form of control? More specifically, how would one direct their children, growing young adults to engage with the world knowing that everything they encounter is meant to manipulate them in some way. I realize that knowing this fact is half the battle, but for example, I now have a hard time watching any entertainment because I am annoyed that I am being propagandized to think a certain way and even though I am awake to it, it still takes the enjoyment out of the act of being entertained.
This article and it's illumination of manufactured consensus and control mechanisms got me thinking about a topic that I have recently (in the past 8 years) have wondered about but haven't had the time to delve into and I was wondering if you had more insight into it specifically. That is the Breast Cancer Awareness Month / Mammogram Industry / Pink Ribbon - Komen Scam.
As a survivor using all alternative treatments (mistletoe) beside surgery and then via that initiation coming to realize the deep lies and manipulations that women are subjected to via the mainstream medical industrial complex, I wonder if this too is a pre-planned psychological operation. The idea that what we focus our attention on persists and what we ignore fades. So wouldn't it be counter-productive for women to focus so healivly on "breast cancer" and "looking for breast cancer" and "fear of breast cancer" and then to give it an entire month with its own marketing program including celebrities and athletes promoting it and reminding woman to get their mammograms. Meanwhile true, non conventional based research shows that mammograms cause more harm than good. The standard of care for BC today is deplorable and accepted, but if anyone questions it we are seen as contributing to misinformation and wanting women to die.
Since I know you have a vast knowledge of much of the manufactured manipulation I was wondering what you know on this topic specifically. Have you written about it or can you point me to someone who has? I would love to learn more about what they are intentionally doing to woman, so I can alert others.
Thank you for your well researched and informational articles.
Lori, thank you for sharing your story - especially your personal journey with alternative treatments and the courage it took to go against the mainstream medical establishment. Your survival and insights are powerful testimony.
You're asking exactly the right questions about manufactured consensus and how it affects everything from entertainment to medical decisions. The breast cancer awareness industry is a perfect example of how fear-based marketing, corporate interests, and social pressure combine to create what looks like grassroots concern but is actually carefully engineered consent.
The psychological aspect you highlighted - that what we focus on persists - is particularly insightful. It's similar to how many of these social engineering programs work: create fear, offer a solution, shame those who question it.
FWIW, I don't have specific answers about the breast cancer industry - just lots of questions, like you. My sense is to do the opposite of what they want: question everything, trust your instincts, find others who are awake to these patterns. It's comforting to know others like yourself are on a similar journey of discovery.
All of this stuff has been written of long ago and FIRST DISCOVERED by prior Pioneers. In this case DAVE MACGOWAN who was killed w turbo cancer over a decade ago for first connecting the dots on the music industry MKUltra culture machine. Which is where this "reporter" lifted the majority of his material from- WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION. This sort of plagiarism is used quite often by Whitney Webb and the plagiarist Griffin, who stole Eustace Mullin's work on Federal Reserve, rewriting out the crucial data on how The Fed was exclusively a JEWISH affair. Let enough time expire? And people forget. Stuff gets erased or buried from online censors... and along comes a Joshura Stylman etc to "edit" others' work and take the credit. Not one thing in this COMPILATION is new research not already known. Good Summary/ But its a cover version, not the original. No Sale
Actually, Dave McGowan was explicitly cited in my piece - his pioneering work on Laurel Canyon is foundational and anyone working in this space stands on his shoulders. Check the citations. As for the rest of your comment suggesting plagiarism, kindly take that elsewhere - all sources were properly attributed and the work speaks for itself. Have a nice day.
Probably worthy of a new book with all parts combined.
Absolutely. I was thinking same.
Having lived through the 60's as a teenager, I found the pop music liberating, which is neither good nor bad. The post world war 2 attitude of the "silent era" was strongly conservative and certainly needed a refreshing overhaul by way of a challenge. I for one am grateful for having lived in those years whch helped to open my eyes to question everything and also to discover who I really am.
Great post. Thanks for this.
Ok so you know…
Brilliant Josh.
Aww shucks, thanks Pamela.
There's some quote that goes something like this: never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. AND, the older I get, the more I think it is the opposite. No, scratch that. I think it boils down to follow the money.
Absolutely fascinating reading!
I believe your substack is going to grow by leaps and bounds. I appreciated the links. Somehow you kept me reading past my initial skepticism.
I think another link between artists with military parents is that they are already used to moving a lot. Touring is not as big a deal for them.
Simone, thank you for the note, and apologies for the delayed reply.
You raise an interesting point about that quote. I've found that the deeper you dig into these patterns, the harder it becomes to chalk things up to mere incompetence or coincidence. The odds become infinitesimal.
When putting together pieces like this, I'm trying to thread a delicate needle - providing enough solid documentation to make the case without overwhelming readers with too much detail. The goal is to show that these aren't random coincidences while keeping the narrative clear and digestible. Glad you made it through the whole thing, despite your initial skepticism - that's exactly the kind of careful consideration these topics deserve.
BTW, that's a great observation about military kids and touring - I hadn't considered that angle, but it makes perfect sense.
Sigh. So much weaponization of everything. No wonder we’re facing such a medical and spiritual autoimmunity crisis. We’re being primed to either surrender to or fight everything. The confusion keeps us constantly vigilant. And while I have heard bits of what you’ve explained so comprehensively, it’s overwhelming to see all at once.
The trouble becomes that we become resistant to things that could serve us in other nuanced ways because of how ideas like personal growth, art, self-care/acceptance, empowerment, advocacy have been distorted and exploited.
The growth curves are so steep and treacherous, but we try to stay on them…
Your insight about autoimmunity and constant vigilance is profound. These systems are designed to keep us in exactly that state of perpetual anxiety and confusion.
You're right - it's overwhelming to confront the possibility that much of what we considered 'authentic' may have been anything but. But understanding the depth and depravity of the deception, however uncomfortable, is crucial. Only by recognizing how deep the manipulation goes can we begin to reclaim genuine human experience and connection.
The path forward isn't cynicism about everything, but clear-eyed discernment. Difficult as it is, we need to look unflinchingly at the machinery of control to free ourselves from it.
Well said.
As a boomer born in the late fifties, I'm wondering what and how an actually liberated person undefined by the systemic cultural herding would be like? How, in God's name, would I be different than the person I was manufactured to be?
Maybe the Amish had it right all along? :-)
It's more about steering the herd in a particular direction. The hubris is almost incalculable.
Many of the groups during this era did not play their own instruments. It wasn't just the Monkees. The Byrd's were backed by professional players, including Glen Campbell. Very few bands toured. They lip synced on programs like Ed Sullivan, Shindig and Hullabaloo. I had a friend who attended high school in Alameda CA with Jim Morrison. I didn't believe him until he showed me the photo in his high school yearbook.
Yep!
See The Wrecking Crew
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wrecking_Crew_(music)
Thanks for this! I admire your writing very much by the way.
Thank you for the kind words. I’m glad you’re enjoying the series.
And with a username like that, I can tell you're someone who brings enthusiasm to everything you do 😄
As if there weren't enough red pills... and now this. Urgh. I'm not sure I can take any more. You've successfully ruined my youth. But this is the price of waking up. Thank you, Joshua. No, that wasn't me being cynical. It's pieces like this (and its predecessor) that start to complete a picture none of us really want to see but we have to anyway. Bring it on.
My mom said something similar when I shared my Beatles research with her. I'll say to you what I told her: still cherish those memories while understanding the bigger picture.
'I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.'
Josh, proof your "The Celebrity Machine graph. It's missing a word or thought:
The approach perfected through Gloria Steinem - channeling authentic social movements through carefully managed spokespersons - would evolve into today's meticulously crafted (what's missing here) This algorithmic management extends beyond content to talent itself, with platforms increasingly determining not just what succeeds but which voices rise to prominence.
Should have read: "would evolve into today's meticulously crafted model of celebrity activism."
Fixed, thank you!
some actually read every word... Well done, btw.
Interesting, with many deeply buried and odd coincidences unearthed and aligned in apparently under-appreciated and telling ways. But if you want to persuade a wider audience you’ve still got work to do, because ultimately it all seems a bit attenuated. So, nice try, but you don’t actually score heavily for pointing out the fact that many entertainment industry stars and lower-visibility stalwarts have strange connections. Taking note of that, even as extensively as you do, doesn’t prove much, nor is it new news. Because the smoke from those fires has been hanging in the air for a very long time. It is understandable how Hollywood and the media biz have generated a legacy that fuels such suspicions. (Here’s one you seem to have missed: the strange demise of Marilyn Monroe.) One huge reason for that is the pervasive undercurrent of nepotism that undergirds much of its unofficial employment policy. That’s been a-feature-not-a-bug since day 1. But nepotism in business hiring is a much broader and more venerable tendency, as you must admit. One thing you seem to be pointing out is the similarity and affinity between people who aspire to dominance-through-influence in both domains: entertainment and government. The connection may seem newsworthy in many particulars, but isn’t that also actually business as usual? To clinch the case you need to expand the frame, consider counterfactuals, and admit the possibility that genuinely organic tendencies and trends exist and may thus mingle with utterly crass commercialization; my favorite example of this phenomenon is the twin-billing of The Monkees and Jimi Hendrix - strange but true, it actually happened. As a tail-end boomer my OG teen culture hero was a scruffy, swarthy working class New Englander with French Canadian and Breton roots. He had no substantial social connections and died of alcoholism in his mid-40s. He was one part lapsed Catholic and 2 parts libertine, with a sublime poetic impulse. His early friends included criminals, bums, and the founder of National Review. He served in the merchant marine during WWII after deciding to quit Columbia and his spot on its football team. His relationships were all kind of tortured or slap-dash affairs, including the friendship with a roguish buddy that became the basis for his best and most influential work. He originally produced that piece in a benzo-fueled marathon, typing like the madman he was on a continuous roll of paper. But he remains one of the most influential figures in 20th century American culture. I’ve looked into him closely several times over the last 45+ years, and have yet to fully grasp what it was that his audience - almost entirely young - responded to in him. The sex? The drugs? The fast cars? The jazz? Jack Kerouac remains a bit of a mystery. As do some others. They vary tremendously but still inspire wonder and hope. So hang in there, and keep working on your thing, and stay free.
I appreciate your thoughtful engagement with the material, Tim.
To clarify - this isn't meant to be comprehensive or persuasive, but rather documentation of ongoing research being shared with some friends and fellow researchers. While I'm considering whether to develop this into a longer-form book or film to make these stories more widely accessible, right now I'm approaching this as a student rather than a teacher - documenting, learning, and connecting with others doing similar research.
Monroe's story, for instance, wasn't overlooked but intentionally set aside as it deserves deeper treatment given its complex intersections with intelligence operations, cultural programming, and policy making. On Hendrix/Monkees - I didn't include it simply because I had nothing meaningful to add to Dave McGowan's thorough coverage.
The nepotism observation is interesting, but I'm specifically tracking unusual patterns like intelligence officers' children entering entertainment rather than following military paths, along with distinct patterns around aristocrats and orphans that merit their own detailed examination.
The documented connections between early Beat experiments with psychedelics and government-sponsored research programs at places like the Menlo Research Institute add another layer to your point about how cultural movements intersect with institutional power. Kerouac himself seemed to sense this by the end of his life, though he interpreted it through a different lens. That both Ginsberg and Kesey were early volunteers for government-sponsored LSD research, before "psychedelic" was even in the lexicon, remains one of the more striking examples of these institutional intersections with the counterculture.
Your insights suggest considerable research experience in these areas. If you're documenting any of your own investigations, I'd be very interested in reading them. Thanks again.
I’m just basing my lines on the motley assortment of anecdotes I’ve stumbled on over the years. It’s all very interesting and strange. I must admit that until learning more about the Ted Kascynski case I was inclined to poo-poo the possibility that domestic influence campaigns could entail such a level of convoluted horror. Then the Gary Webb story clinched perpetual suspicion for me. (Or was it the other way around?) One positive Beat contribution was to decline the casual acceptance of constraining norms, and pushing back against the clandestine control schemes you’ve noted is another way of doing that - thank you. We’ll have our hands full with this stuff going forward - but so will the bad guys, since their opposition is also formidable.
Sorry I missed this earlier, Tim. Really interesting point about Webb and Kaczynski as eye-openers on domestic influence ops. Webb's story especially shows the playbook - deny, discredit, then quietly admit it years later when no one's paying attention anymore. Totally agree about the road ahead. As you said, the opposition to these systems is getting more sophisticated too. The Beats' rejection of social programming feels more relevant than ever. Thanks for the thoughtful exchange.
Looks like this guy lifted website of Vigiliant Citizen's work from last 20 yrs. (among others). Next generation comes up, and nobody is the wiser.
As noted, the smoke has been hanging in the air for awhile now. But the efforts to keep it there persist - successfully in most cases. I've tracked a few fishy situations that merit more attention only to see the impact of revelations fall flat or run into outright denial. It's enough to induce general cynicism, that's for sure. But I'm glad someone's still digging.
If you have anything constructive to add to the discussion, you're welcome to do so. Otherwise, kindly take your unfounded accusations elsewhere.
Wow. Thank you for this. I had read about Laurel Canyon. My father was a VP for Capitol Records during that time until his death in 2004. I am trying to piece together what happened to him. This was helpful. I am still unlearning everything I was taught to believe. The process may never end at this rate.
Whoa, it must be profound to look back at that era with new eyes, especially given your direct family connection.
The process of unlearning and questioning our inherited beliefs is indeed ongoing - and often unsettling. But there's something powerful in seeking to understand our own histories and those of our family members that came before us. For what it's worth, I suspect most people in these industries were unassuming and not complicit in any wrongdoing - just doing their jobs and living their lives while larger forces operated behind the scenes.
You're not alone in this journey of discovery. Take care as you piece together these complex personal and historical threads.
This was a lot of great information in one place. I was aware of some of this prior, but not to this level of detail.
One question is how to move forward and continue to engage with the world when you realize almost everything you have experienced has been part of a manufactured form of control? More specifically, how would one direct their children, growing young adults to engage with the world knowing that everything they encounter is meant to manipulate them in some way. I realize that knowing this fact is half the battle, but for example, I now have a hard time watching any entertainment because I am annoyed that I am being propagandized to think a certain way and even though I am awake to it, it still takes the enjoyment out of the act of being entertained.
This article and it's illumination of manufactured consensus and control mechanisms got me thinking about a topic that I have recently (in the past 8 years) have wondered about but haven't had the time to delve into and I was wondering if you had more insight into it specifically. That is the Breast Cancer Awareness Month / Mammogram Industry / Pink Ribbon - Komen Scam.
As a survivor using all alternative treatments (mistletoe) beside surgery and then via that initiation coming to realize the deep lies and manipulations that women are subjected to via the mainstream medical industrial complex, I wonder if this too is a pre-planned psychological operation. The idea that what we focus our attention on persists and what we ignore fades. So wouldn't it be counter-productive for women to focus so healivly on "breast cancer" and "looking for breast cancer" and "fear of breast cancer" and then to give it an entire month with its own marketing program including celebrities and athletes promoting it and reminding woman to get their mammograms. Meanwhile true, non conventional based research shows that mammograms cause more harm than good. The standard of care for BC today is deplorable and accepted, but if anyone questions it we are seen as contributing to misinformation and wanting women to die.
Since I know you have a vast knowledge of much of the manufactured manipulation I was wondering what you know on this topic specifically. Have you written about it or can you point me to someone who has? I would love to learn more about what they are intentionally doing to woman, so I can alert others.
Thank you for your well researched and informational articles.
-Lori
Lori, thank you for sharing your story - especially your personal journey with alternative treatments and the courage it took to go against the mainstream medical establishment. Your survival and insights are powerful testimony.
You're asking exactly the right questions about manufactured consensus and how it affects everything from entertainment to medical decisions. The breast cancer awareness industry is a perfect example of how fear-based marketing, corporate interests, and social pressure combine to create what looks like grassroots concern but is actually carefully engineered consent.
The psychological aspect you highlighted - that what we focus on persists - is particularly insightful. It's similar to how many of these social engineering programs work: create fear, offer a solution, shame those who question it.
FWIW, I don't have specific answers about the breast cancer industry - just lots of questions, like you. My sense is to do the opposite of what they want: question everything, trust your instincts, find others who are awake to these patterns. It's comforting to know others like yourself are on a similar journey of discovery.
All of this stuff has been written of long ago and FIRST DISCOVERED by prior Pioneers. In this case DAVE MACGOWAN who was killed w turbo cancer over a decade ago for first connecting the dots on the music industry MKUltra culture machine. Which is where this "reporter" lifted the majority of his material from- WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION. This sort of plagiarism is used quite often by Whitney Webb and the plagiarist Griffin, who stole Eustace Mullin's work on Federal Reserve, rewriting out the crucial data on how The Fed was exclusively a JEWISH affair. Let enough time expire? And people forget. Stuff gets erased or buried from online censors... and along comes a Joshura Stylman etc to "edit" others' work and take the credit. Not one thing in this COMPILATION is new research not already known. Good Summary/ But its a cover version, not the original. No Sale
Actually, Dave McGowan was explicitly cited in my piece - his pioneering work on Laurel Canyon is foundational and anyone working in this space stands on his shoulders. Check the citations. As for the rest of your comment suggesting plagiarism, kindly take that elsewhere - all sources were properly attributed and the work speaks for itself. Have a nice day.
Taylor Swift…Happy Rockefeller…Gloria Steinem….what do they have in common??
😂