Great series! I am familiar with (and a fan of) everyone you listed under essential voices except for #3, so I will check her out. I would add the podcasts Psyop Cinema and Subliminal Jihad (https://substack.com/home/post/p-138830336?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web) as well as books by Jasun Horsley.
In 2022 I wrote a piece somewhat along these same lines in regard to reality TV and such--https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/dimmed-by-the-deluge.
Thanks for these great references (and, the kind words).
Yes, Courtenay Turner's knowledge of Tavistock and some of these larger themes is encyclopedic - I've had the pleasure of getting to know her personally and she's as lovely as she is brilliant.
Your exploration of Warhol's prescient vision of image culture and its evolution through Josh Harris's experiments into today's algorithmic reality really resonates with my piece on digital control and performative authenticity. Interesting connection - I actually had a short-lived show (about fantasy sports) show on Pseudo around '97/'98 when Harris was running it.
The Psyop Cinema team does some far-out and genuinely fascinating work, though I kept my piece focused on a narrower scope, trying to keep it somewhat accessible for normies. I haven’t gone as deep into Subliminal Jihad’s catalog, but their two-part series on the Grateful Dead was incredibly informative and helped shape my perspective.
Jasun Horsley's "Vice of Kings" and "Big Mother" were two of my most impactful reads last year. While it also felt a bit beyond the scope of this piece, his insights are absolutely crucial. I actually had the honor of being a guest on his podcast recently - the episode is here if you're interested:
That episode is how I was introduced to your work-- great conversation. Although I probably would have eventually found you through the Brownstone Institute.
I think Sam Tripoli and Sage of Quay and some of the others you listed are still a little far out for normies but this stuff is breaking into the mainstream more and more. Candace Owens has a large reach and is covering a lot of it.
Edie Sedgwick is part of the 27 club and her death was a bit sketchy. Interesting about the Pseudo connection!
I finally got my hands on a copy of Horsley's 16 Maps of Hell so working my way through that one before I get to the others. Definitely the best book I've read in the last couple of years.
Yes, Jasun has that rare combination of intelligence and earned wisdom - in my observation, it's rare for people to demonstrate both nowadays. I'm curious what you think of 16 Maps of Hell. I haven't ventured there yet though a friend of mine has (he is all in on Jasun's work).
Funny you mention Brownstone - this piece should be up there next week. I think subconsciously I wrote it to introduce their more academic audience to some of these themes. I enjoy bridging those worlds - mixing Bernays and McLuhan with someone like Sam Tripoli, who packs profound knowledge into hilarious delivery and dick jokes. And Mike Williams (Sage of Quay) does something crucial - he meticulously shows his work. I found him after reading "Memoirs of Billy Shears" when my head was about to explode. His research is astonishing and thoroughly convincing.
My Edie knowledge is limited, though I'm aware of her cultural significance.
Candace is a longer conversation, but I see her as part of the method of revelation - covering important topics while fitting into a larger dialectic. Her family connections are as interesting as her public statements.
Candace's family connections are definitely interesting. I feel like once she covers something it is at a point that it can no longer be concealed, although I think she is the only one who has dug into Kamala's family background.
I remember Sam from the comedy scene in L.A. ten to fifteen years ago but recently he performed in my current city and it was great to sit in an audience of like-minded people. I hope Jimmy Dore performs here someday for the same reason.
Having lived in L.A. I relate to a lot of 16 Maps of Hell, and although I had stumbled across some of the information elsewhere a lot of it is also new to me. I would like to read "Seen and Not Seen" next because I am interested in his questions around being a fan of someone who turns out to be something else entirely.
Apologies for the delayed reply. I'm still getting the hang of this :-)
You're right about Candace - she seems to surface things right at that tipping point when they can no longer stay hidden. The Kamala deep dive was particularly interesting, though my friends and I were somehow aware a couple of years ago. I see Owen's role as part of a larger revelation mechanism - her background and connections suggest careful positioning within the dialectic.
That's fantastic you caught Sam back in LA. And yes, there's something powerful about being in a room of people who 'get it' - Dore has that same effect. Both of them manage to deliver heavy truth with levity, which might be the most effective delivery system.
I need to check out 16 Maps and Seen and Not Seen - it seems particularly important now when so many "trusted voices" seem to be playing assigned roles.
Absolutely excellent discussion series, and extremely well-done in tying together all components of this strategic plan for control of the masses by the global cabal elites. This is the year that it all falls apart, as we complete the 5D chess game. ♘♖♕♔
Those actively resisting the constant barrage of behavioral modification stimuli, have always been statistical outliers, and no wonder; the conditioning is exhaustive and maintaining awareness of it is exhausting.
The net effect of smothering cognition in conditioned response patterns is dissonance, and we observe its effects all 'round us, every day. This paradigm isn't new, by any means, it's simply become more inescapable.
The precursor to social credit was "reputation." Compliance with its metrics was possible, and the result was to foster needful complacency. The metrics didn't change, allowing a measure of contentment conducive to enhanced mental health.
From a behavioral health standpoint, today's flood of response conditioning is counterproductive to the point of malevolence. It isn't obvious how to inculcate the self-possession required to maintain emotional equilibrium.
It is a category error to assume that compliance can offer surcease; the stimuli are intended to create chronic states of unease, and their efficacy is reflected in what we encounter everywhere we look. The placidity we observe among the compliant is a surface expression, one that is extremely brittle.
In the face of all this, we should not wonder at the rise of monomania as defense mechanism.
Thank you, Mr. Stylman, for this most interesting and helpful series of essays.
Thanks for the kind words and apologies for the slow reply.
You've captured something profound here - particularly about the exhausting nature of maintaining awareness against behavioral modification.
Your point about compliance offering no real escape is crucial. The system isn't designed for resolution but for maintaining chronic unease - what I'd call productive anxiety. What we see isn't peace but learned helplessness masking deeper turmoil.
The observation about monomania as a defense mechanism resonates strongly. It's a natural response when patterns of meaning-making break down - the mind seeks refuge in singular, manageable narratives.
We're seeing the effects of chronic cognitive dissonance everywhere, and the switch from stable reputation to fluid social credit metrics is particularly destabilizing. This helps explain why digital spaces feel increasingly manic-depressive, oscillating between performative calm and outbreak. From a behavioral health standpoint, we're running a massive psychological experiment without controls or ethics review. This may be the most significant issue of the last 100 years.
Thank you for your kind and perceptive reply, Mr. Stylman.
Appropriately, I think, your perspective is broad, identifying "the" experiment. That seems accurate, but it's also worth noting that "the experiment" is an identification of the whole ultimately being greater than the sum of its parts.
Viewed from a more granular, transaction-by-transaction viewpoint, what we see are myriad smaller experiments in applied behavioral science. When I think back on it, "How to Win Friends and Influence people" was a seminal work that brought "salesmanship" to ordinary people of my generation.
When we peer behind that curtain, we see the mechanics of the thing, and the exponential growth of persuasion as "essential life skill." We're like fish swimming in water that way; we normally don't "see" the water. It doesn't do to become mired down in the minutiae, but it's essential to see the "nuts and bolts" of the matter.
Concurrently, we're also experiencing severe degradation of the underpinnings of our social contract, and that brings us squarely into the realm of eroded trust levels. The existential competition for scarce resources has been civilized by rulesets establishing trust. No business can function without it, no interpersonal relationship can ever provide security and emotional stability without it.
For myself, I have observed this paradigm as an evolution within business over the past four decades, and as an insider. Without getting into a lengthy exposition of detail, I will just remark that the erosion of trust correlates strongly with financialized economies wherein actual production of essential commodities is concentrated within ever-smaller cohorts, with increasing layers of people partaking of the cash flow generated by those activities. The incentives become perverse.
Operating within that milieu is exhausting; a misstep leading to loss, and this is why parsing The Narrative Du Jour is necessary.
It's why your work is meaningful and important.
On a very real, practical level, we all operate on pattern recognition formed by conditioned response. The Work of Pavlov, Skinner, Stoddard et al, is a structural framework upon which others like Perls (Gestalt) and Berne (transaction analysis) built methodologies.
This is some of the best stuff I've read in a long time! Not sure why you are getting trolled so hard on ZeroHedge, other than being extremely articulate, well laid out, and 100% correct. Appreciate you taking the time to write this series.
So weird, that was the proper link when I published this a week ago. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up - fixed.
And, thanks for the kind words. Some friends and I have been researching this stuff for the last few years and finally starting to document it into a proper story. More to come, I hope.
A recent post by Alexander Dugin touched the issue of fear vs horror, and the potential of people being manipulated after they are pushed into the state of fear or horror subconsciously. In addition, Notorious provocations are used not to discredit anyone or anything, but simply to trigger people's anger and hence higher probability of losing the "cool", the careful, conscientious thinking process. Democracy needs civilized debates. One can interfere by either making the debate a shouting match or making the participants mindless. Either way, there will be no civilized debates based on facts and reasoning. REF = https://substack.com/@alexanderdugin/p-153445974
I don't have a comprehensive idea as how to deal with the situation. Within the very short term, I think we need to (1) Wake people up to the truth behind many social symptoms, and (2) non-compliance, especially for messages from the Magnificent Seven. It is OK to buy their stocks if you insist, but don't trust their products. (3) Drop your cell phone if you can afford. Your cellphone, especially the modern smarter ones, cannot be powered off (unless you take out the battery) and it is listening to what you say all the time (part of the reason they consume power so much and forced to pursue the finest semiconductor geometry)
The Dugin insight about fear vs. horror connects perfectly to the Tavistock methods - using psychological vulnerability to reshape consciousness. These provocations aren't random but calculated to keep us in a perpetual state of reactivity that prevents clear thinking.
While non-compliance is crucial, I'd suggest the control system goes far beyond just the Magnificent Seven. Your cell phone observation is telling - it's a perfect example of how convenience becomes a trojan horse for surveillance. But finding ways to resist without isolating ourselves is key, since atomization is also part of their strategy. That's why building real-world communities and authentic connections becomes so important. Remember, the opposite of globalism is _________?
Use people-to-people connection to break the persona/media-to-people connection. The starting point is the people around us, from family members to neighbors. Or in a sense, localism?
It uses the Hamilton 68 premise to launch into the 10-15 yr progression of government involvement with social media. I think it was interesting to read about how the Arab spring told one narrative of the populations relationship with social media with certain politicians at the epicenter. And then 5/10 years later those same politicians have pivoted into a contradictory posture with regards to how they handle the same entities. Siegel's article also stressed the importance of the origins of words in messaging. And while the article might come across as a partisan piece, it's a warning about the encroachment of an oligarchy into our lives. When I share articles like that one or your series or, for instance, the last testimony of David Asher, with others, the response is often "yeah we already knew that, what does this change?" or apathy or condescension. But I think tracking the progression is the most important element. Not just knowing the truth after the fact. Your series, much like the book Chaos, have touched on how the setup for this stuff was there for a long time. It's worked itself into our infrastructure over a long long time. So I go back to Hayek, and read that stuff and shudder. Anyways, thanks for shining the light. Will continue to read....
Fantastic series, thank you! I'm puzzled, though that you appear to see Musk as a good thing (???) and believe that the celebrity messaging during the US election campaign appeared to backfire. It all worked out exactly as the puppet masters planned, didn't it?
I'm actually trying to move away from thinking just in terms of 'good guys' and 'bad guys' - instead, I'm more focused on understanding how cultural engineering operates and where it's taking us. While I appreciate a lot of what he says and does, as well as any platform's commitment to free speech principles (though I did explicitly note the limitations of X on there), we need to look at the bigger picture.
With Elon specifically, there are some interesting data points worth considering:
- Neuralink is arguably leading the charge on the transhuman agenda
- He has significant DoD connections through SpaceX
- The climate agenda ties with electric vehicles
- His grandfather headed the Technocratic party a century ago
- The synchronized narrative attacks against him (similar to what we saw with Trump - like DJT, that could mean the vitriol is real or controlled spectacle)
You can read my writing and infer my take pretty easily. Could he be just a business mogul who developed a conscience? For sure. However, it seems more likely that he was (perhaps quite literally) born to play this particular role in the larger narrative.
I tried to write this piece with a more entrenched historical perspective and didn't get into the occult but it plays such a central role. This thread is out there but it's dense, informative and pretty surreal:
Joshua, found your article on Zero Hedge this morning and quickly realized that I had to read all 3 in the series. Thank you! I will look into subscribing to your Substack to support your significant efforts. My question is…why? Who benefits from all this and what is the endgame? Perhaps we need to look to the Amish for insights (and even leadership) they seem to have a handle on things. Where can I find you on free podcasts?
As for who benefits, this is probabaly not the best space to articulate a fully formed pov but generally, the power structure. By shaping movements they can steer and/or thwart real resistance. The Amish have it right, for sure.
I haven't done many podcasts - certainly not about this sort of thing.
Incredible series. Thank you. I'd add "A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century" by Siegel in Tablet Magazine too. Former intel officer. Thank you again.
Great series! I am familiar with (and a fan of) everyone you listed under essential voices except for #3, so I will check her out. I would add the podcasts Psyop Cinema and Subliminal Jihad (https://substack.com/home/post/p-138830336?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web) as well as books by Jasun Horsley.
In 2022 I wrote a piece somewhat along these same lines in regard to reality TV and such--https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/dimmed-by-the-deluge.
And later I found a great episode by Subliminal Jihad on Josh Harris-- https://soundcloud.com/subliminaljihad/11-launder-my-head.
Thanks for these great references (and, the kind words).
Yes, Courtenay Turner's knowledge of Tavistock and some of these larger themes is encyclopedic - I've had the pleasure of getting to know her personally and she's as lovely as she is brilliant.
Your exploration of Warhol's prescient vision of image culture and its evolution through Josh Harris's experiments into today's algorithmic reality really resonates with my piece on digital control and performative authenticity. Interesting connection - I actually had a short-lived show (about fantasy sports) show on Pseudo around '97/'98 when Harris was running it.
The Psyop Cinema team does some far-out and genuinely fascinating work, though I kept my piece focused on a narrower scope, trying to keep it somewhat accessible for normies. I haven’t gone as deep into Subliminal Jihad’s catalog, but their two-part series on the Grateful Dead was incredibly informative and helped shape my perspective.
Jasun Horsley's "Vice of Kings" and "Big Mother" were two of my most impactful reads last year. While it also felt a bit beyond the scope of this piece, his insights are absolutely crucial. I actually had the honor of being a guest on his podcast recently - the episode is here if you're interested:
https://childrenofjob.substack.com/p/jobcast-41-a-devastated-terrain
That episode is how I was introduced to your work-- great conversation. Although I probably would have eventually found you through the Brownstone Institute.
I think Sam Tripoli and Sage of Quay and some of the others you listed are still a little far out for normies but this stuff is breaking into the mainstream more and more. Candace Owens has a large reach and is covering a lot of it.
Edie Sedgwick is part of the 27 club and her death was a bit sketchy. Interesting about the Pseudo connection!
I finally got my hands on a copy of Horsley's 16 Maps of Hell so working my way through that one before I get to the others. Definitely the best book I've read in the last couple of years.
Yes, Jasun has that rare combination of intelligence and earned wisdom - in my observation, it's rare for people to demonstrate both nowadays. I'm curious what you think of 16 Maps of Hell. I haven't ventured there yet though a friend of mine has (he is all in on Jasun's work).
Funny you mention Brownstone - this piece should be up there next week. I think subconsciously I wrote it to introduce their more academic audience to some of these themes. I enjoy bridging those worlds - mixing Bernays and McLuhan with someone like Sam Tripoli, who packs profound knowledge into hilarious delivery and dick jokes. And Mike Williams (Sage of Quay) does something crucial - he meticulously shows his work. I found him after reading "Memoirs of Billy Shears" when my head was about to explode. His research is astonishing and thoroughly convincing.
My Edie knowledge is limited, though I'm aware of her cultural significance.
Candace is a longer conversation, but I see her as part of the method of revelation - covering important topics while fitting into a larger dialectic. Her family connections are as interesting as her public statements.
Candace's family connections are definitely interesting. I feel like once she covers something it is at a point that it can no longer be concealed, although I think she is the only one who has dug into Kamala's family background.
I remember Sam from the comedy scene in L.A. ten to fifteen years ago but recently he performed in my current city and it was great to sit in an audience of like-minded people. I hope Jimmy Dore performs here someday for the same reason.
Having lived in L.A. I relate to a lot of 16 Maps of Hell, and although I had stumbled across some of the information elsewhere a lot of it is also new to me. I would like to read "Seen and Not Seen" next because I am interested in his questions around being a fan of someone who turns out to be something else entirely.
Apologies for the delayed reply. I'm still getting the hang of this :-)
You're right about Candace - she seems to surface things right at that tipping point when they can no longer stay hidden. The Kamala deep dive was particularly interesting, though my friends and I were somehow aware a couple of years ago. I see Owen's role as part of a larger revelation mechanism - her background and connections suggest careful positioning within the dialectic.
That's fantastic you caught Sam back in LA. And yes, there's something powerful about being in a room of people who 'get it' - Dore has that same effect. Both of them manage to deliver heavy truth with levity, which might be the most effective delivery system.
I need to check out 16 Maps and Seen and Not Seen - it seems particularly important now when so many "trusted voices" seem to be playing assigned roles.
That's interesting you were on to Kamala earlier-- I had no idea. Your last paragraph refers I think to Ted's comments here, but I agree.
Absolutely excellent discussion series, and extremely well-done in tying together all components of this strategic plan for control of the masses by the global cabal elites. This is the year that it all falls apart, as we complete the 5D chess game. ♘♖♕♔
Those actively resisting the constant barrage of behavioral modification stimuli, have always been statistical outliers, and no wonder; the conditioning is exhaustive and maintaining awareness of it is exhausting.
The net effect of smothering cognition in conditioned response patterns is dissonance, and we observe its effects all 'round us, every day. This paradigm isn't new, by any means, it's simply become more inescapable.
The precursor to social credit was "reputation." Compliance with its metrics was possible, and the result was to foster needful complacency. The metrics didn't change, allowing a measure of contentment conducive to enhanced mental health.
From a behavioral health standpoint, today's flood of response conditioning is counterproductive to the point of malevolence. It isn't obvious how to inculcate the self-possession required to maintain emotional equilibrium.
It is a category error to assume that compliance can offer surcease; the stimuli are intended to create chronic states of unease, and their efficacy is reflected in what we encounter everywhere we look. The placidity we observe among the compliant is a surface expression, one that is extremely brittle.
In the face of all this, we should not wonder at the rise of monomania as defense mechanism.
Thank you, Mr. Stylman, for this most interesting and helpful series of essays.
Thanks for the kind words and apologies for the slow reply.
You've captured something profound here - particularly about the exhausting nature of maintaining awareness against behavioral modification.
Your point about compliance offering no real escape is crucial. The system isn't designed for resolution but for maintaining chronic unease - what I'd call productive anxiety. What we see isn't peace but learned helplessness masking deeper turmoil.
The observation about monomania as a defense mechanism resonates strongly. It's a natural response when patterns of meaning-making break down - the mind seeks refuge in singular, manageable narratives.
We're seeing the effects of chronic cognitive dissonance everywhere, and the switch from stable reputation to fluid social credit metrics is particularly destabilizing. This helps explain why digital spaces feel increasingly manic-depressive, oscillating between performative calm and outbreak. From a behavioral health standpoint, we're running a massive psychological experiment without controls or ethics review. This may be the most significant issue of the last 100 years.
Thank you for your kind and perceptive reply, Mr. Stylman.
Appropriately, I think, your perspective is broad, identifying "the" experiment. That seems accurate, but it's also worth noting that "the experiment" is an identification of the whole ultimately being greater than the sum of its parts.
Viewed from a more granular, transaction-by-transaction viewpoint, what we see are myriad smaller experiments in applied behavioral science. When I think back on it, "How to Win Friends and Influence people" was a seminal work that brought "salesmanship" to ordinary people of my generation.
When we peer behind that curtain, we see the mechanics of the thing, and the exponential growth of persuasion as "essential life skill." We're like fish swimming in water that way; we normally don't "see" the water. It doesn't do to become mired down in the minutiae, but it's essential to see the "nuts and bolts" of the matter.
Concurrently, we're also experiencing severe degradation of the underpinnings of our social contract, and that brings us squarely into the realm of eroded trust levels. The existential competition for scarce resources has been civilized by rulesets establishing trust. No business can function without it, no interpersonal relationship can ever provide security and emotional stability without it.
For myself, I have observed this paradigm as an evolution within business over the past four decades, and as an insider. Without getting into a lengthy exposition of detail, I will just remark that the erosion of trust correlates strongly with financialized economies wherein actual production of essential commodities is concentrated within ever-smaller cohorts, with increasing layers of people partaking of the cash flow generated by those activities. The incentives become perverse.
Operating within that milieu is exhausting; a misstep leading to loss, and this is why parsing The Narrative Du Jour is necessary.
It's why your work is meaningful and important.
On a very real, practical level, we all operate on pattern recognition formed by conditioned response. The Work of Pavlov, Skinner, Stoddard et al, is a structural framework upon which others like Perls (Gestalt) and Berne (transaction analysis) built methodologies.
This is some of the best stuff I've read in a long time! Not sure why you are getting trolled so hard on ZeroHedge, other than being extremely articulate, well laid out, and 100% correct. Appreciate you taking the time to write this series.
Haha, I hadn't seen that. Thankfully, I'm comfortable in my own skin :-)
I appreciate your interest and the kind words.
House keeping note:
The “John Coleman, The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations “ link takes everyone to a Heather Graham book.
But your insights and depth are fuk’n brilliant mate. Sharing this with everyone I can get to sit long enough to read it.
Subscribed and will be following your work.
So weird, that was the proper link when I published this a week ago. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up - fixed.
And, thanks for the kind words. Some friends and I have been researching this stuff for the last few years and finally starting to document it into a proper story. More to come, I hope.
A recent post by Alexander Dugin touched the issue of fear vs horror, and the potential of people being manipulated after they are pushed into the state of fear or horror subconsciously. In addition, Notorious provocations are used not to discredit anyone or anything, but simply to trigger people's anger and hence higher probability of losing the "cool", the careful, conscientious thinking process. Democracy needs civilized debates. One can interfere by either making the debate a shouting match or making the participants mindless. Either way, there will be no civilized debates based on facts and reasoning. REF = https://substack.com/@alexanderdugin/p-153445974
I don't have a comprehensive idea as how to deal with the situation. Within the very short term, I think we need to (1) Wake people up to the truth behind many social symptoms, and (2) non-compliance, especially for messages from the Magnificent Seven. It is OK to buy their stocks if you insist, but don't trust their products. (3) Drop your cell phone if you can afford. Your cellphone, especially the modern smarter ones, cannot be powered off (unless you take out the battery) and it is listening to what you say all the time (part of the reason they consume power so much and forced to pursue the finest semiconductor geometry)
The Dugin insight about fear vs. horror connects perfectly to the Tavistock methods - using psychological vulnerability to reshape consciousness. These provocations aren't random but calculated to keep us in a perpetual state of reactivity that prevents clear thinking.
While non-compliance is crucial, I'd suggest the control system goes far beyond just the Magnificent Seven. Your cell phone observation is telling - it's a perfect example of how convenience becomes a trojan horse for surveillance. But finding ways to resist without isolating ourselves is key, since atomization is also part of their strategy. That's why building real-world communities and authentic connections becomes so important. Remember, the opposite of globalism is _________?
Use people-to-people connection to break the persona/media-to-people connection. The starting point is the people around us, from family members to neighbors. Or in a sense, localism?
🎯
It uses the Hamilton 68 premise to launch into the 10-15 yr progression of government involvement with social media. I think it was interesting to read about how the Arab spring told one narrative of the populations relationship with social media with certain politicians at the epicenter. And then 5/10 years later those same politicians have pivoted into a contradictory posture with regards to how they handle the same entities. Siegel's article also stressed the importance of the origins of words in messaging. And while the article might come across as a partisan piece, it's a warning about the encroachment of an oligarchy into our lives. When I share articles like that one or your series or, for instance, the last testimony of David Asher, with others, the response is often "yeah we already knew that, what does this change?" or apathy or condescension. But I think tracking the progression is the most important element. Not just knowing the truth after the fact. Your series, much like the book Chaos, have touched on how the setup for this stuff was there for a long time. It's worked itself into our infrastructure over a long long time. So I go back to Hayek, and read that stuff and shudder. Anyways, thanks for shining the light. Will continue to read....
Please take a look at the the virus "rampage" that is taking place in China the last week of 2024!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-IGSdSow4A
Please do not forget what Peter Hotez promised for January 21st, 2025:
https://rumble.com/v5wbp02-dr-peter-hotez-predicts-unleashing-of-pandemic-on-january-21-2025.html
Trump Fills the Swamp to Overflowing – COVID-19 Vaccine Enthusiast is Surgeon General – LGBTQ+ Champion Billionaire is Treasury Secretary:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2024/trump-fills-the-swamp-to-overflowing-covid-19-vaccine-enthusiast-is-surgeon-general-lgbtq-champion-billionaire-is-treasury-secretary/
There is a reason the English word "pharmacy" comes from the Greek word "pharmakeia" but is translated "sorcery" in the book of Revelation!:
https://sumofthyword.com/2021/02/02/pure-from-the-blood-of-all-men/
Civil unrest will commence this spring as we just entered the 4th year of this timeline!:
https://sumofthyword.com/2016/10/04/the-rapture-of-the-church-is-after-the-tribulation/
Fantastic series, thank you! I'm puzzled, though that you appear to see Musk as a good thing (???) and believe that the celebrity messaging during the US election campaign appeared to backfire. It all worked out exactly as the puppet masters planned, didn't it?
Thanks so much, Helen.
I'm actually trying to move away from thinking just in terms of 'good guys' and 'bad guys' - instead, I'm more focused on understanding how cultural engineering operates and where it's taking us. While I appreciate a lot of what he says and does, as well as any platform's commitment to free speech principles (though I did explicitly note the limitations of X on there), we need to look at the bigger picture.
With Elon specifically, there are some interesting data points worth considering:
- Neuralink is arguably leading the charge on the transhuman agenda
- He has significant DoD connections through SpaceX
- The climate agenda ties with electric vehicles
- His grandfather headed the Technocratic party a century ago
- The synchronized narrative attacks against him (similar to what we saw with Trump - like DJT, that could mean the vitriol is real or controlled spectacle)
You can read my writing and infer my take pretty easily. Could he be just a business mogul who developed a conscience? For sure. However, it seems more likely that he was (perhaps quite literally) born to play this particular role in the larger narrative.
I tried to write this piece with a more entrenched historical perspective and didn't get into the occult but it plays such a central role. This thread is out there but it's dense, informative and pretty surreal:
https://x.com/drutangreborn/status/1686122151156359174?s=46
Thanks for replying, Joshua! I'd agree with the second take on Musk, definitely. I'll have a look at your link, thank you!
Gigi Young also has a lot to say about the occult nature of Musk's work, especially in relation to Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuBOtedk88g
Joshua, found your article on Zero Hedge this morning and quickly realized that I had to read all 3 in the series. Thank you! I will look into subscribing to your Substack to support your significant efforts. My question is…why? Who benefits from all this and what is the endgame? Perhaps we need to look to the Amish for insights (and even leadership) they seem to have a handle on things. Where can I find you on free podcasts?
Thanks for the interest and the kind words.
As for who benefits, this is probabaly not the best space to articulate a fully formed pov but generally, the power structure. By shaping movements they can steer and/or thwart real resistance. The Amish have it right, for sure.
I haven't done many podcasts - certainly not about this sort of thing.
Incredible series. Thank you. I'd add "A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century" by Siegel in Tablet Magazine too. Former intel officer. Thank you again.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/guide-understanding-hoax-century-thirteen-ways-looking-disinforma
The link was broken but I think I read that when it was published - it's about the Hamilton 68 stuff, right?