39 Comments

Yes to all of this. File under Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

Expand full comment

That is an all time classic fact check, unbelievable. Thank you for this!

Expand full comment

Totally. And no questioning as to why there is a difference between the two.

Expand full comment

So, in essence, the most reliable source of information found in the mainstream media is in their retractions!

Expand full comment

Which go mostly unseen, sadly.

Expand full comment

I will be enthusiastically sharing this. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Josh, You weren't kidding when you said you were preparing to write more. All of these recent pieces have been superb. Good to see you getting into a groove. Some of these pieces are finding their ways onto Senators' desks...hope they read them.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Doc. Clearly, I have a lot to get off my chest :-)

Expand full comment

It's all about money. The TV ads that will be stopped, big pharma losing legal immunity for their shoddy products, scientific magazines that will lose pharma money and will have to return to real science, etc. As they say, follow the money. And isn't it funny that the left puts money over all else including their childrens' health

Expand full comment

I used to think that. Nowadays, I believe it goes deeper than just money - they own the printing press, so they literally define what value is. When you control the measuring stick itself, there's a bigger agenda at play. If you go back and read old texts from intellectuals of the 1900s, it becomes evident this roadmap's been hiding in plain sight for at least a century.

Expand full comment

Thanks, that was worth reading. You've reminded me of another good Substack which discussed an inevitable trend toward more meaningful media and social media as in good written content rather than clickbait/doomscrolling. It's a subtext to what you're reporting - the desire for meaningful content inexorably drawing out the truth. Reminds me of Occam's Razor and how the truth emerges from the plethora of information as the simplest answer that fits the facts.

Also, an irony is the term fake news, which was (I'm sure) originated by mainstream media to disparage alternative views on the covid conola and is now invariably applied to mainstream media!

Expand full comment

I'm so grateful to Katharine Austin-Fitts for her recommendation of you and your writing. The essays I've read in your last four posts have brought such clarity to me thus helping me in how I disseminate the information to others who are so helplessly indoctrinated in the MSM's narrative. I thank and applaud you~ Keep it up ... we are listening and sharing with others.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for your kind words - they mean a great deal to me. Catherine Austin Fitts has been hugely influential on my own thinking, so knowing that she has recommended my writing is truly a thrill. I'm glad that my essays have been helpful to you in sharing ideas and cutting through the noise. We really do need one another more than ever now, and it’s heartening to know we’re all working together to spread clarity and truth. Thank you for listening and sharing. Let’s keep the conversation going.

Expand full comment

The NYT seems to be doubling down on the divisive personal attacks which is very confusing in the wash up of the election … surely NYT has realised that this was an implicit popular endorsement of RFK too? Is big pharma paying for ads in the NYT?

Expand full comment

Pharma funds most of the MSM, which must then do its bidding in order to survive. Practically all MSM is "Brought to you by Pfizer."

Expand full comment

No one with a brain actually thought most of those pandemic era policies would do much good. Just like no one believes taking your shoes off at the airport or emptying your water bottle makes you safer. I always chalked it up to "doing something" (even if infective) as opposed to "doing nothing" made others feel more secure for some reason.

Expand full comment

Exactly! It's security theater, just like how at the movies or a stadium, people will join a long line simply because others are in it, even when there's an empty line right next to it.

The pandemic revealed an uncomfortable truth about human nature: we're wired to follow the herd, even when it makes no logical sense. Our species had a massive test of independent thinking and critical judgment. We failed spectacularly.

Expand full comment

Not all of us failed and many of those who did have learned. They may not fail going forward.

Expand full comment

I love that expression! "Security theatrer"

Expand full comment

Well done, Joshua. “Why wouldn't you want proper safety testing for chemicals we're expected to inject into our children's bodies?” is so simple, how do you reject that? The Media Mob avoids the truth of it in favor of ad revenue, ensuring (I hope) further decline into obscurity and irrelevance. It didn’t work during the election process and it won’t work now. Kind of pathetic to witness them flailing around, trying every name-calling, slanderous appeal to an ever declining audience for their pablum.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Chris.

You are correct in observing that the simplest questions are often the most powerful, and the most telling when they go unanswered. Watching mainstream media dodge basic inquiries while hemorrhaging credibility has been remarkable. Once trust is gone, it's nearly impossible to rebuild - I believe we're there now. The name calling just reveals their desperation.

Expand full comment

I think the response to that question would be the deeply ignorant, “They DO test these jabs for safety and efficacy.” It doesn’t take much effort to get past this flimsy argument, but it takes SOME effort, beyond blindly swallowing whatever Legacy Media reports.

Expand full comment

Yup. That's what absolutely stunned me when I started having questions about vaccines... the whole edifice fell apart SO FAST! It wasn't hard to find the information about how problematic they are.

In my effort to "read both sides of the story" I tried reading a pro-vaccine book. But it was full of straw men - it didn't answer any of my questions. And then began the belittling of anyone how has questions. Not to mention it's impossible to find a pro-vaccine book by something that doesn't have skin in the game.

Expand full comment

Exactly. Once you start probing, you can’t go back. The Red Pill.

Expand full comment

That's the exact problem - they can't let him speak for more than 30 seconds because if they do, people will see how erudite and eminently reasonable he is.

Expand full comment

Calling someone anti science has the sound of "You're stupid" to me.

I don't care if I'm called stupid lol.

Expand full comment

What if someone is moving at the "speed of science"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnxlxzxoZx0

Expand full comment

The term “Managed Decline” has been part of American political discourse since Bush43 handed the White House keys to the Obamas. And nobody made hay of it. It was just accepted. But Trump’s MAGA campaign introduces the concept of “Managed Restoration” and the left goes off-the-rails apeshit. They can’t help themselves pouring gasoline on their own funeral pyres.

Expand full comment

You're right about managed decline, but I'd argue it started even earlier. I believe what we've witnessed is essentially a generational pump & dump scheme. The post-war prosperity wasn't sustainable - the system was designed to extract maximum value before the inevitable crash. The reaction to MAGA wasn't about the specific policies - it was about maintaining the illusion that the decline wasn't intentional. When someone threatens to expose the game, that's when the mask really comes off. Now, the bill is due one way or another.

Expand full comment

A reasonable analysis.

Expand full comment

If you’ve ever driven Route 1 up Midcoast Maine, you’ve gone past Red’s Eats, an unduly famous purveyor of lobster rolls. There are two other lobster shacks fifty yards across the road. Red’s has a line around the block while the other two have no lines. They all serve the same lobster on the same hotdog bun. In fact, the other two are on the waterfront with ample seating, far better than Red’s for enjoying Maine’s stunning coastline!

Expand full comment

Yes. See also, Mike's Pastry in Boston's North End. Tourist wander the neighborhood with the trademark blue and white boxes of cannolis. If I ran the Modern Pastry, steps away, my storefront would feature a big picture of Bill Clinton scarfing one down at Mike's back in the 90's with a caption like "hope he washed his hands"

Expand full comment

My brother lives right around the corner from Mike’s on Henchman Street. I used to love their lobster tails!

Expand full comment