The Clone Wars Have Already Begun

The Science of Identity Replication Is Already Here

Jun 04, 2025

Your voice can be stolen to fool your family into thinking you said things you never did. Your face can be perfectly faked. Your digital identity can be cloned, predicted, and replaced. This isn't science fiction—it's documented reality.

This past weekend, the President just "re-truthed" a post claiming his predecessor was executed in 2020 and replaced by a clone. While Donald Trump himself has questioned Joe Biden's cognitive state and the legitimacy of documents signed by autopen, by sharing this clone theory without comment to his nearly 10 million followers, he amplified a much more extreme claim. Whether Trump is trolling, stoking conspiracy theories, or perhaps knows something the rest of us don't is impossible to determine—what matters is understanding the technological capabilities that make such scenarios possible in the first place.

What follows is an investigation into documented technological capabilities, drawing from scientific papers, corporate demonstrations, government records, and industry reports. Where I speculate, I'll tell you. Where the technology is confirmed, the sources speak for themselves.

We're Being Told to Ignore Our Eyes

Anyone around me for the last few years knows I've believed Biden isn't the same person who served as Vice President—that's not a political view, just pattern recognition. We are being told to ignore our eyes. A man with different ears, different teeth, different skull shape, different voice, different gait, and what feels like a different soul is said to be the same man. To say otherwise is treated as madness.

The common explanation? Plastic surgery. But here's the medical reality: would a man of his age undergo botox, eye lift, chin implant, facelift, jaw shave, rhinoplasty, bone brow reduction, AND cheek implants to completely alter his ears? The American Society of Plastic Surgeons confirms patients over 65 face no higher complication rates, but this level of reconstruction seems medically absurd for someone of Biden's age and position.

The Technology for Deception Already Exists

As former CIA Chief of Disguise Jonna Mendez explained in her demonstrations, "In five seconds, I can completely change someone's appearance. We've been perfecting this for decades.” She was describing technology they were using with staggering effectiveness in the 1970s—imagine what's possible now with digital enhancement and advanced materials?

In 2025, a consultant was fined $6 million for AI voice cloning Biden—creating robocalls that sounded exactly like him, fooling voters. This technology can manipulate loved ones into believing you said things you never uttered. FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel warned, "It is now cheap and easy to use Artificial Intelligence to clone voices and flood us with fake sounds and images."

In 2018, what appeared to be Barack Obama delivered a public service announcement warning about deepfakes—except it wasn't Obama at all. Jordan Peele had completely synthesized Obama's face and voice. In the video, "Obama" warned: "We're entering an era where our enemies can make anyone say anything at any point in time."

The message was cautionary, but the subtext was unmistakable: the technology already exists—and the warning was the proof. As I explored in my MKULTRA series on consciousness manipulation, we've entered an era where seeing is no longer believing.

But it goes deeper than voices and faces. Today, researchers are building "digital twins"—AI-driven simulations that replicate your behavior, preferences, and emotional responses in real time. Entire social media ecosystems are being mirrored to study how information moves, how belief spreads, and how populations can be nudged without knowing it.

If they can twin an entire platform, they can twin a person. And if they can twin you, they can predict you, preempt you, impersonate you—and eventually, replace you. Not just biologically. Psychologically. They don't just copy your body—they replicate how you think, react, decide.

The tools to fake a President are available on the open market. The only thing missing is your consent—and they've already automated that too. Every click, every agreement you scroll past, every biometric scan you submit becomes tacit consent.

But the digital realm is only the beginning. The infrastructure for biological manipulation has been decades in the making. What if the technology exists to create not just digital clones but biological replicas? This isn't another random attack on our consciousness—it's part of the same coordinated assault I've been chronicling, just deployed through different vectors.

Epstein's Genetic Blueprints

About 18 months ago, as part of my exploration into technological control systems, I started digging into cloning and how it might relate to transhumanism. I'd read reports about Epstein's genetic interests at his Zorro Ranch, so I started examining the symbolism at his island for clues. I came across this statue of a Holstein Friesian cow that sat prominently on his property.

That caught my attention because I had just read that Ghislaine Maxwell had dated Ted Waitt, the CEO of Gateway Computers, but what made me perk up even more was realizing that Gateway used that exact same cow breed as their brand identity.

So I looked deeper into this breed. Turns out Holstein Friesians haven't just been genetically manipulated—they've been actively cloned. Starbuck (2)II, a clone of the famous bull Hanoverhill Starbuck, was born in 2000 through the combined efforts of Canadian agricultural research institutions. This wasn't experimental—it was operational cloning technology, decades ago.

The New York Times revealed Epstein's desire to literally seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his New Mexico ranch. He wanted to use his wealth to create a breeding program with his genetic material. When someone with those resources and connections is thinking about genetic manipulation on that scale, cloning technology becomes an obvious next step. When you consider the symbolic breadcrumbs—the cow statue representing a cloned breed, the connections through Maxwell to tech companies using that same imagery—it starts to paint a picture of someone deeply interested in genetic manipulation and replication.

Whatever was happening at Zorro Ranch likely goes beyond most of our imaginations. But here's what we can be pretty sure of: this wasn't merely about blackmail or indulgence. Based on extensive research by people like Whitney Webb, Epstein's genetic research was central to his operation, likely involving intelligence agencies like Mossad, CIA, and/or MI-6. The goal was likely ensuring compliance for future projects—and given his documented interest in human genetic manipulation, cloning seems like a logical next step.

The Science Is Already Here

Remember Dolly the Sheep? For younger readers, she was the first mammal we know of created through reproductive cloning, born in 1996.

But cloning animals has since become routine—farmers regularly clone livestock, celebrities clone dead pets for around $50,000, and Argentina's President Javier Milei owns five cloned English mastiffs. Horse cloning is a lucrative industry with genes from award-winning horses selling for over $200,000.

Do you think the power structure developed this capability and then just... stopped?

I guess if Bill Clinton told them to halt human cloning research, that means they did, right? Heh.

While the U.S. had its moratorium, other players were moving forward. An Israeli company called Clonaid claimed in 2002 to have performed the first human reproductive cloning, producing a child named "Eve." The company appears connected to a religious movement, and candidly, I don't know what to make of their claims.

But here's the interesting part: in 2018, rapper Kid Buu publicly stated he was a second-generation clone produced by Clonaid, even providing what he claimed was his model number. Of course, it could be a publicity stunt, but it's notable that he referenced the same company.

What's definitely not a stunt is this 2018 story: Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced he had genetically edited babies, claiming to be "proud of his work" and stating another volunteer was pregnant as part of his research. The scientific community erupted, but the technology clearly existed.

Around the same time, Matthew Meselson, a U.S. scientist from Harvard, who had helped establish international biowarfare bans warned that technological advancements could open a “Pandora's box" of genetic modifications that might "threaten the essence of humanity.”

J. Craig Venter, who mapped the human genome, made the capabilities even clearer in 2010 testimony to a presidential bioethics commission that researcher Benjamin Conner uncovered: 'All you need is the digital information and a DNA synthesizer... any virus sequence that's in the public databases can be pretty readily remade." If genetic information is just downloadable data, what's stopping someone from downloading and reconstructing a human?

They normalized GMO food. Why would humans be off limits? The hint is that we already do. mRNA technology was described by Bayer's Stefan Oelrich in terms usually reserved for genetic modification. As Oelrich stated at The World Health Summit: 'We're really taking that leap to drive innovation in cell and gene therapies... ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.'

While fact-checkers have emphasized that Oelrich was highlighting public acceptance rather than making technical classifications, his framing reveals how pharmaceutical executives view these technologies—as part of the same developmental continuum. The public was told these were traditional vaccines, while industry insiders were discussing them in the context of genetic technologies.

Let's pause. This isn't about whether Biden is a clone—it's about whether the tools to replicate, manipulate, or replace human beings exist. And they do.

From Nazi Experiments to Predictive Programming

What I'm certain of is that by the mid-20th century, unethical human experimentation was well-documented through programs like MKULTRA and others. After World War II, Operation Paperclip brought some of the smartest scientists in the world—Nazi researchers—directly into NASA, the CIA, and other U.S. agencies. These weren't just rocket scientists—many had backgrounds in biological and genetic research.

Josef Mengele, the infamous Nazi doctor, conducted horrific experiments on twins at Auschwitz, obsessively documenting minute physical similarities and differences. According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, he performed unnecessary surgeries, transfusions, and injections on twins, often without anesthesia, in attempts to unlock the secrets of heredity. While his precise motivations remain debated among historians, his methodical documentation of genetic traits and twin development suggests an interest in genetic manipulation that predates modern cloning techniques by decades.

Hollywood has made films exploring these themes. In the 70s, The Boys from Brazil depicted Nazis attempting to clone Hitler using DNA samples provided by Josef Mengele. But given Hollywood's known connections to the CIA and the propensity toward revelation of the method, is it possible these films were preparatory rather than fictional?

A 1943 OSS memo reveals the CIA's intent to use Hollywood for psychological warfare—what we now recognize as predictive programming.

More recently, other films have explored similar themes: Multiplicity, The Island, They Cloned Tyrone—each normalizing the concept of human duplication and replacement. When reality starts mirroring fiction, the public has already been conditioned to accept it.

The Industrial Pipeline

There's a company called EctoLife that's created promotional materials for what they call "the world's first artificial womb facility." They claim it would incubate 30,000 lab-grown babies annually, based on "over 50 years of groundbreaking scientific research." The video about the project makes it seem as if it's imminent rather than hypothetical.

Naturally, Reuters tried to debunk this as "taken out of context," but EctoLife maintains they're planning exactly what their promotional video shows. Whether it's operational now or not, the fact that someone is seriously planning industrial-scale artificial human production should concern everyone.

This isn't a sci-fi imagination—it's a business plan. If they can grow 30,000 babies in a lab, they can certainly grow one politician, one influencer, one of you.

Consider the full picture that's emerging: The technology to clone humans exists. The financial resources exist. The institutional infrastructure exists. The historical precedent exists.

In an era where advanced disguise technology, body doubles, AI synthesis, and genetic manipulation are all confirmed realities, how can anyone verify authentic identity? When your face can be cloned, your voice faked, and your DNA rewritten with existing technology, traditional assumptions about identity become meaningless. As I explored in DNA as Data, my analysis of biological surveillance, we're entering an era where your genetic blueprint becomes another vector for control and manipulation.

The burden of proof has fundamentally shifted. We can no longer assume that figures on our screens are who they claim to be.

What's Really at Stake

I'm not claiming Biden was cloned—while I have an opinion, I have no idea if it’s just a guy that looks different, is an actor wearing a mask, is a deepfake on a green screen, or was actually cloned. My goal is documenting technological capabilities that exist far beyond most people's understanding.

Here's what I know for certain: we've been systematically lied to about our history, technical capabilities, and relationships to the world around us. The political theater obscures the technological reality.

When identity can be fabricated and biology rewritten using confirmed scientific methods, traditional concepts of consent become meaningless. Sovereignty isn't a given anymore—it's a battlefield fought with technologies most people don't even know exist.

Your government hides this information. Legacy media either ignores it or frames it as conspiracy theory. If you don't dig into this reality now and share what you discover, you're allowing them to rewrite the fundamental nature of human existence without resistance.

The Stage Is Set

Every piece of this technological infrastructure already exists:

Identity manipulation through CIA disguise technology and AI voice/face cloning.
Genetic engineering capabilities demonstrated from Dolly the sheep through He Jiankui's gene-edited babies to mRNA modification.
Mass production potential through companies like EctoLife planning industrial-scale artificial reproduction.
Historical precedent from Nazi experiments through Operation Paperclip to modern genetic research.
Cultural preparation through predictive programming in films and media.
Financial infrastructure evidenced by Epstein's genetic research networks and companies like Altos Labs, Synthetic Genomics, and Ginkgo Bioworks actively developing synthetic biology capabilities.

The clone wars haven't begun—they're already here.

Whether Biden is a guy in a mask or a clone, Trump is playing a scripted role, or any public figure is who they appear to be matters less than recognizing the documented capabilities that make such scenarios possible. We're living in a theater where identity is fluid, biology is malleable, and reality itself can be manufactured.

As I documented in my MKULTRA series—from The Laboratory that designed the psychological tools, through The Theater that staged their deployment, to The Network that scaled them globally—we're witnessing the culmination of decades-long projects to engineer human consciousness and identity. The possibility of human cloning represents just one frontier in this broader war for cognitive sovereignty.

These political dynamics feel like theater—and I can't bring myself to worship actors in a show written by someone else. In a world where people can potentially be replaced like actors in a movie, it's the ideas and agendas we need to focus on, not the individual players on stage

For A Later Date: The Repopulation Mystery

One of the most jaw-dropping rabbit holes I've explored is what appears to be a massive "repopulation" exercise in the late 1800s United States that most history books never mention. World Fairs prominently displayed premature infants in "incubator baby" exhibits as both scientific marvels and eugenics spectacles. "Orphan trains" relocated an estimated 250,000 children from East Coast cities to rural areas as essentially indentured labor. "Baby farming" operations accepted unwanted children for profit, with many simply left to die.

Les Fées aux Choux (The Fairy of the Cabbages), arguably the first narrative film ever made in 1896, depicted babies being artificially created from cabbage patches. For viewers of that era, this concept apparently resonated enough to warrant filming and distribution. Why would artificial human creation be the subject of the first narrative film in history? What context existed then that made this concept familiar rather than shocking?

This is a much deeper topic that connects to everything we've discussed here in ways that might surprise you—one I'll explore more fully in a future piece. If you're curious about the most mind-bending aspects, check out Mind Unveiled's YouTube channel, especially his exploration of 'cabbage patch babies’. Yes, the folk tale that babies come from cabbage patches has stranger historical roots than you might imagine. For now, understand that the pattern of technological control over human identity and reproduction might not actually be new—it's just reaching its technological culmination.